A recording of today's gospel and blog can be accessed via this link.
****
Today’s
gospel (Matthew 13: 54-58) recounts an episode in which Jesus visits Nazareth
and finds the population sceptical about His ministry. Where did this man
get his wisdom and these mighty works? they wonder. Their questions come
thick and fast, and before long the mood grows dark: They took offence at
him. Jesus’ response to this precipitous judgement was philosophical but
also practical. A prophet is not without honour except in his home town,
He concluded, and He performed few miracles for them, the gospel says, because
of their unbelief.
Sometimes, human
beings are sunk simply by their own shortcomings. Here is Nazareth, the
neediest of Israel’s villages, well known as a place of dishonour. And yet,
instead of celebrating their local celebrity, the people were filled with
scepticism at Jesus’ works. Was it not right to ask questions? Of course, it
was. Was it not a normal requirement to discern well in such circumstances?
Without a doubt. So, why did the Nazarenes go so wrong in the process?
The clue might
be found in this gospel’s subtext, what lies beneath the surface. Where did
this man get his wisdom? only appears to be a fair inquiry. Yet
behind it is a kind of jealous attack. It is not Jesus’ wisdom that they were
inquiring about. They were reacting instead to the very fact of it, like
neighbours who react and say: have you seen what the Jones’s have done now?
After that first question, therefore, every other inquiry was an attempt to
demean the Messiah in their midst: Is not his mother called Mary? Are not
his brothers James and Joseph and Simon and Judas? Yet again, we must read
the subtext, the thing that lies beneath the surface: these questions were
rhetorical, not genuinely interrogative. They were not about what they were
about. They did not seek information. Rather, they sought to make the point
that whatever Jesus had done, He was simply a local boy and didn’t deserve the
acclaim. And there is the wayward human heart in a nutshell, souring like milk
in the warm summer sun.
Jesus
cannot heal us until we have fully recognised how broken we are, but we cannot
fully recognise how broken we are when we are jealously comparing ourselves to
others. The crowd’s questions almost amount to asking: why should we not be
just as renowned as Jesus? Jealousy manifests itself in different ways; in
the impious, it is simple, raw, and aggressive, as it is in this scene. In the
pious, it might show itself through flattery or imitation or in an ill-disguised
competitiveness for heavenly glory. But both categories of people are moved by
the same force from within, the same instinct to want to show that they are as
good as the one they are jealous of, or at least that those they are jealous of
are no better than them. Perhaps it is because they do not know their own worth
for only those who neglect their worth in God’s eyes look upon the qualities of
others as a measure of their own failings.
But what is
the measure of who we are, of what we are to become, and indeed of what we are
worth? Are these things not determined by our vocation: our personal
vocation, calling us to be our very own reflection of the goodness and
beauty of our divine Creator, and our life’s vocation, calling us to
some particular path of living? Instead of finding our guide in these two
realities, we often allow who we are and what we are worth to be shaped by so
many other forces in the human game of inauthenticity: by social pressures –
the kind that the crowd try to exert in this gospel – or by covetous pursuit
when we run towards not what God calls us to be but towards the thing that most
seems attractive to us: wealth, fame, influence. Instead of vocation, we seem
to aspire to self-promotion. But the truth is that we are least ourselves when
we most wish to seem and to grab.
Nazareth of Our Lord’s day is the anti-culture of vocation: it is not interested in hearing God’s call, nor in honouring God’s call in others. To dwell spiritually in the Nazareth of England in the living holy house of the heart, proposes another way.
Hi Brian! Not a comment but a question. Why was Nazareth seen as the neediest of villages and a place of dishonour?
ReplyDeleteGood question. Every country seems to have a town or place that gets a bad reputation. In England, people we are not speaking to are "sent to Coventry", the grubbiest and ugliest of industrial towns (now much rehabilitated). In France, it is Limoges which has this dubious distinction. In John 1: 14, Nathaniel responds to hearing that Jesus is a Nazarene by saying, “Nazareth? Can anything good come out of Nazareth?” It is never even mentioned in the Old Testament. It has none of the social and economic distinctions of places like Capernaum. Were it not for the fact the Son of God lived there for most of His life, we might never have even heard its name!
ReplyDeleteSorry, Nathaniel's remark is in John 1:46
ReplyDelete