An audio version of today's gospel and blog can be accessed here.
****
Today's gospel (Matthew 8: 18-22) contains two very brief
dialogues between Jesus and two of his would-be followers. To the first of
these who offers to follow the Lord, Jesus tells him that the Son of Man has
nowhere to lay his head. To the second, who must first go to bury his father, Jesus
tells him to let the dead bury their own dead.
In a way, the second of these is the easiest to understand.
Jesus’ language is hyperbolic, of course, but we are used to that by now: if
your eye offends you, pluck it out. If Jesus is savage here, it is no doubt
because it is what He perceived the man needed to hear; not because there was
anything unpraiseworthy in burying his own father. Indeed, since the Lord
commanded the Jews to honour their father and their mother, one might even say
that burying his father was part of the man's fulfilment of the law. There is
some circumstance behind this request that the gospel does not communicate to
us; there is some hidden agenda or attachment that slows this man down in the
following of the Lord. And the Lord, because he loves the man so much, is
brutally frank with him.
It is the first of these dialogues which is more complex and
yet, perhaps, more important, because it touches on a more subtle fault then mere
attachment to family. That at least is human. But what is the problem with the
first questioner? After all, his offer to follow the Lord seems to be supremely
generous. Teacher, I will follow you wherever you go. It is not
just that the man is offering to become a disciple of the Lord. He seems here
to have taken account of the literal vagaries of Jesus’ ministry: wherever
you go. Well, perhaps he had - at a very material level. The scribe must
have noted Jesus’ wanderings between the various towns and villages of the Holy
Land. What he had perhaps not noticed is that the following of Jesus was not
going to be merely an outward journey. It was destined more particularly to be
an inward journey, a journey into those twin mysteries that surround us: the enthralling
mystery of the Eternal Godhead and the bewildering mystery our deeply flawed
selves; a journey into life, but also a journey into the night. If we tell the
Lord that we would follow Him wherever He goes, we have to know exactly what
that means. Perhaps like many things in the Christian life, however, its full
meaning escapes our limited understanding.
So, was the Lord sending this man away? Not definitively or ultimately.
The fact is that there are different ways to follow the Lord. Some of us may be
called to follow Him wherever He goes in every sense of the word, taking
nothing with us, being stripped of everything we otherwise cling to in ways we
have not even begun to imagine. Yet others may be asked to become other kinds
of follower; there is more than one kind of flower in the garden of the Lord. In
the Christian life and in the galaxy of spiritualities, everything is good, but
not everything is good to do. This is a paradox that can be hidden from us by
our religious enthusiasm. Perhaps indeed this was the problem with the scribe: he
was not a follower but an enthusiast.
But, what does this paradox mean for us? Everything is good
in the galaxy of spiritualities, but not everything is good to do. What this
means simply is what St Paul means when he says that there are many gifts but
only one Spirit. Since all the gifts come from the one Spirit, does that mean
we are called to embrace them all, or that we may embrace them all? Not at all.
St Therese of Lisieux amuses us when she says that she chooses everything, and
of course in the spirit it seems to her that she rejoiced in everything because
she recognised everything as coming from the Lord. But, in point of fact, she could
not choose everything. She chose to be a cloistered nun; which meant that she
chose a path that led not to the marriage bed go to the convent choir; not to a
physical maternity with its human perimeters made literally of blood, sweat and
tears, but to a spiritual maternity which only a few years years after her
death would see her statue standing in what seems like almost every single
Catholic church around the globe, and millions upon millions of Catholics
finding in her example and her prayers a rich resource in the following of
Jesus. She chose so little; and yet her fruit has been extraordinarily
abundant. Humanly, she did next to nothing; spiritually, she practically bust
the bank.
Everything is good, but not everything is good to do. The
following of Jesus is good, but not if we're trying to follow him in a way that
is wayward, or that He does not call us to. This should be a caution to us all.
There is a kind of appetite that comes from religious enthusiasm which leads
into a spirituality of addition; we have one devotion, but we must add another;
we do one ministry but we must do another; we accept one apostolate but there
is another that must be done. The great problem with such a spirituality of
addition is that it leads to a spirituality of division: it divides our
energies in ways that the Lord did not plan for us; it depletes us rather than
renews us.
The calling of the Lord is always to embrace our gifts with
the spirituality of multiplication; it is a story of loaves and fishes. We are
given little but, by faith, that little can become something abundant. We must
not think about this in terms that are too human. We are not all meant to bestride
the world; we may only be meant to make a difference to the person next to us. What
a calamity it would be for us if through religious enthusiasm and through an
all-too-human embrace of our calling, we missed the realities in front of us.
Lord, I will follow you wherever you go - this should
not be our prayer. But rather, Lord where are you leading me? To which
question, we might have to content ourselves with the answer he gave to St
Peter when St Peter inquired about St. John's destiny: What is that to thee?
Follow thou me.